2025 MARC Bi-State Sustainable Reinvestment Corridor Community Survey

Caution: JavaScript execution is disabled in your browser or for this website. You may not be able to answer all questions in this survey. Please, verify your browser parameters.
Transit Investment Options
idbkp
68
68
INFO

After conducting a thorough existing conditions analysis, the project team has recommended four potential alternatives (options) for investment in transit across the corridor. The options are:

A) - Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Light: Invest in a new BRT Light route on an east-west corridor (similar to a MAX  line in Kansas City, MO, such as the Troost or Prospect MAX).
      ● Location of stops: New route would have a stop every quarter-mile
      ● Frequency of transit: New route would come approximately every 20 minutes
      ● Costs: Approximately $7 million per mile for construction; $172 per hour of service for operations

B) - Bus Rapid Transit: Invest in a new Bus Rapid Transit route, a higher frequency route with longer stop spacing that operates in a dedicated travel lane, allowing it to move faster.
      ● Location of stops: New route would have a stop every one-third to two-thirds of a mile
      ● Frequency of transit: New route would come approximately every 8-10 minutes
      ● Costs: Approximately $11 million per mile for construction; $172 per hour of service for operations

C)Streetcar: Invest in a new streetcar route, a rail-based transit option that operates on fixed tracks and typically runs at street level in mixed traffic. This mode often attracts additional economic development, but it also requires more substantial upfront infrastructure than bus-based services.
      ● Location of stops: New route would have a stop every one-third to two-thirds of a mile
      ● Frequency of transit: New route would come approximately every 10-15 minutes
      ● Costs: Approximately $125 million per mile for construction; $365 per hour of service for operations

D) No Additional Investment: Move forward with currently planned changes in the project area, but make no additional investment in transit or redevelopment.
      ● Location of stops: Unchanged
      ● Frequency of transit: Unchanged
      ● Costs: No additional cost

Q1
Transit Investment Options: Based on the information provided above, how would you rate your support for these transit investment options?
Very Supportive Supportive Neutral Not Very Supportive Not At All Supportive Don't Know No answer
1. Bus Rapid Transit Light (similar to MAX)
2. Bus Rapid Transit
3. Streetcar
4. No Additional Investment
MAP

Map of Route Options Under Consideration for the Corridor:

Q2
New Transit Route Use: Based on the map above, please rate how likely you would be to use the following transit routes if they were added to the system.
Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Don't Know No answer
01. 1B (KCK – Parallel Pkwy – BRT Light)
02. 1C (KCK – State Ave – BRT Light or BRT)
03. 2A (KCK – Quindaro Blvd – BRT Light)
04. 2B (KCK – Minnesota Ave– BRT Light or BRT)
05. 3A (KCK-KCMO – I-70 – BRT)
06. 3B (KCK-KCMO – 12th Street – BRT Light, BRT or Streetcar)
07. 4A (KCMO – Independence Ave – BRT Light or BRT)
08. 4B (KCMO – Truman Rd – BRT Light)
09. 5A (KCMO-Sugar Hill/Independence – Independence Blvd – BRT Light or BRT)
10. 5B (KCMO-Independence – Truman Rd – BRT Light)